Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert (Bob) Clarence Irwin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete - Peripitus (Talk) 03:57, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Robert (Bob) Clarence Irwin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability is not inherited. Son of Steve Irwin. May well have a notable article in the future, but not yet, plus, we should respect the privacy of people who haven't thrust themselves into the limelight. Shadowjams (talk) 10:05, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wp:NOTINHERITED. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 16:05, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No independent notability established. -- Mattinbgn\talk 02:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. THIS is not sufficient to establish notability. WWGB (talk) 03:32, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Possibly redirect to article about Steve Irwin. Thus far, the 6 year old has done nothing to be notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.