Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Former Heads of Defence Services of India voice alarm on issues affecting Defence Services and Veterans, 2015

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Former Heads of Defence Services of India voice alarm on issues affecting Defence Services and Veterans, 2015

Former Heads of Defence Services of India voice alarm on issues affecting Defence Services and Veterans, 2015 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NOT NEWS DGG ( talk ) 23:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete; the page seems more like a news article or opinion piece. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a WP:SOAPBOX and it's WP:NOTNEWS Kraxler (talk) 23:59, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, and per Kraxler. The underlying topic might warrant an article, but this isn't the way to do it Nick-D (talk) 23:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete: doesn't seem like this should be a stand alone article. Some of the information, as Nick suggests, could be placed into a higher level article. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.