Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Bieber
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. A7 — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Jeremy Bieber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable relative of notable person Jayakumar RG (talk) 14:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NOTINHERITED, would attract no coverage if he was not Justin's father.TheLongTone (talk) 14:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Being the father of someone famous doesn't imply any notability on its own. 2Flows (talk) 14:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Notability is not inherited. Cowlibob (talk) 14:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - There's something funny about making the "not inherited" point in this case. Regardless, it's also an unsourced BLP that makes no other claim to notability. --— Rhododendrites talk | 16:10, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete for obvious reasons pointed out above!, Being a father to someone doesn't mean you're notable. –Davey2010 • (talk) 16:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - may I ask why this article was not proposed for deletion in accordance with WP: BLP PROD? DJAMP4444 18:59, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Because some idiot would slap in a source, and it would still have to be taken to Afd.TheLongTone (talk) 20:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedydelete... Why is this here?--Müdigkeit (talk) 20:30, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.